by Eddie Mon Jan 12 2015, 18:14
Yes this looks very encouraging, maybe. I am familiar with some of Trudi's work. What I would like to know is what is her idea of what is low carb. I have seen far too many diabetics and HCP's saying they low carb on 150 grams per day. This is a very long way from my ideal of low carb a maximum of 50 grams per day. Some words from Trudi in the last year.
"In the UK, many of the starchy staple foods release the glucose quickly into the blood i.e. they are high GI foods. But when people are advised to base their meals on carbohydrate, many of them end up eating over 300 grams a day.
Through our experience of delivering structured education, many people reduce their carbohydrate intake to between 130-260 grams per day and are able to improve their diabetes control and body weight as a result. To date, lower carbohydrate diets have not shown any negative effects.
If people wish to experiment with lowering their daily carbohydrate intake to below the 130 grams per day, they should be told that the long-term outcome is not yet known and, if they would like to persevere, they should be supported in doing so by their diabetes care team."
If Trudi is recommending a true low carb diet great, what concerns me are the phoney so called low carb diets we see in so many anti low carb posts and so called studies. (how many times have we seen low carb antis at the big one say they are low carbers, when they are not) This is also evidenced in the phoney saturated fat studies, especially on rats and other animals. Has anyone else noticed the times a high sugar high fat food is fed to the trial participants, also very often non saturated fats are used to skew the truth.
Clearly, low carb high fat is taking off big time and no longer the so called "fad diet" the genie is out of the bottle and will never go back. The junk food big pharma spiral of slow death has been outed, and that can only be good for all, whether diabetic or not.